Abstract
Abstract
Background
The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), hepcidin (HEPC), phospholipase A2 group IIA (PLa2G2A), and myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC1) for tuberculosis (TB). These four biomarkers are differentially regulated between quiescent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infected individuals (non-progressors to TB disease) and Mtb-infected TB disease progressors 6 months before the onset of symptoms.
Methods
We enrolled samples from patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pulmonary infections diseases including 23 TB cases confirmed by smear microscopy and culture, and 34 TB-negative cases. For each participant, the serum levels of the four biomarkers were measured using ELISA.
Results
The levels of CK-MB and HEPC were significantly reduced in patients with active TB disease. CK-MB median level was 2045 pg/ml (1455–4000 pg/ml) in active TB cases and 3245 pg/ml (1645–4000 pg/ml) in non-TB pulmonary diseases. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, HEPC and CK-MB had the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 79% (95% CI 67–91%) and 81% (95% CI 69–93%), respectively. Both markers correlated with TB diagnosis as a single marker. PLa2G2A and MYBPC1 with AUCs of 48% (95% CI 36–65%) and 62% (95% CI 48–76%) did not performed well as single biomarkers. The three markers’model (CK-MB-HEPC-PLa2G2A) had the highest diagnostic accuracy at 82% (95% CI 56–82%) after cross-validation.
Conclusion
CK-MB and HEPC levels were statistically different between confirmed TB cases and non-TB cases. This study yields promising results for the rapid diagnosis of TB disease using a single marker or three biomarkers model.
Funder
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Medicine
Reference39 articles.
1. WHO | Global tuberculosis report 2018 [Internet]. WHO. Available 2019 Aug 29, from http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed 29 Aug 2019
2. Afsar I, Gunes M, Er H, Sener AG. Comparison of culture, microscopic smear and molecular methods in diagnosis of tuberculosis. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2018;31:435–8.
3. Perez-Velez CM, Marais BJ. Disease burden and recent epidemiologic shifts. Tuberculosis. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1008049.
4. Ngabonziza JCS, Ssengooba W, Mutua F, Torrea G, Dushime A, Gasana M, Andre E, Uwamungu S, Nyaruhirira AU, Mwaengo D, Muvunyi CM. Diagnostic performance of smear microscopy and incremental yield of Xpert in detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in Rwanda. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2009-x.
5. Chegou NN, Essone PN, Loxton AG, Stanley K, Black GF, van der Spuy GD, van Helden PD, Franken KL, Parida SK, Klein MR, Kaufmann SHE, Ottenhoff THM, Walzl G. Potential of host markers produced by infection phase-dependent antigen-stimulated cells for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in a highly endemic area. PLoS ONE. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038501.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献