Toward Shared Control Between Automated Vehicles and Users

Author:

Terken JacquesORCID,Pfleging Bastian

Abstract

AbstractTechnological developments in the domain of vehicle automation are targeted toward driver-less, or driver-out-of-the-loop driving. The main societal motivation for this ambition is that the majority of (fatal) accidents with manually driven vehicles are due to human error. However, when interacting with technology, users often experience the need to customize the technology to their personal preferences. This paper considers how this might apply to vehicle automation, by a conceptual analysis of relevant use cases. The analysis proceeds by comparing how handling of relevant situations is likely to differ between manual driving and automated driving. The results of the analysis indicate that full out-of-the-loop automated driving may not be acceptable to users of the technology. It is concluded that a technology that allows shared control between the vehicle and the user should be pursued. Furthermore, implications of this view are explored for the concrete temporal dynamics of shared control, and general characteristics of human machine interface that support shared control are proposed. Finally, implications of the proposed view and directions for further research are discussed.

Funder

N.A.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Reference27 articles.

1. Adminaite, D., Calinescu, T., Jost, G., et al.: Ranking EU progress on road safety. Twelfth Annual Road Safety Performance Index report, June 2018. https://etsc.eu/12th-annual-road-safety-performance-index-pin-report/. Accessed 1 April 2019

2. Pfleging, B., Schmidt, A.: (Non-)Driving-related activities in the car: defining driver activities for manual and automated driving. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Experiencing Autonomous Vehicles: Crossing the Boundaries between a Drive and a Ride at CHI’15, Seoul, Korea, 18–23 April, 2015. http://www.medien.ifi.lmu.de/pubdb/publications/pub/pfleging2015ndra/pfleging2015ndra.pdf

3. Lin, P.: The ethics of autonomous cars. The Atlantic, 8 October, 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/the-ethics-of-autonomous-cars/280360, Accessed 24 March 2014

4. Michon, J.A.: On the multidisciplinary dynamics of traffic science. IATSS Res. 11, 31–40 (1987)

5. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 30(3), 286–297 (2000)

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3