Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Sentinel lymph-node (SLN) mapping for early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is comprehensive and consequently time-consuming and costly. This study evaluated the clinical value of several SLN imaging components and analyzed the accuracy for SLN identification using a streamlined SLN imaging protocol in early-stage OSCC.
Materials and methods
This retrospective within-patient evaluation study compared both number and localization of identified SLNs between the conventional SLN imaging protocol and a streamlined imaging protocol (dynamic lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for 10 min directly post-injection and SPECT-CT at ~ 2 h post-injection). LSG and SPECT-CT images of 77 early-stage OSCC patients, scheduled for SLN biopsy, were evaluated by three observers. Identified SLNs using either protocol were related to histopathological assessment of harvested SLNs, complementary neck dissection specimens and follow-up status.
Results
A total of 200 SLNs were identified using the streamlined protocol, and 12 additional SLNs (n = 212) were identified with the conventional protocol in 10 patients. Of those, 9/12 were identified on early static LSG and 3/12 on late static LSG. None of the additionally identified SLNs contained metastases; none of those in whom additional SLNs were identified developed regional recurrence during follow-up. Only inferior alveolar process carcinoma showed a higher rate of additionally identified SLNs with the conventional protocol (p = 0.006).
Conclusion
Early dynamic LSG can be reduced to 10 min. Late static LSG may be omitted, except in those with a history of oncological neck treatment or with OSCC featuring slow lymphatic drainage. Early static LSG appeared to be contributory in most OSCC subsites.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Loree JT, Popat SR, Burke MS, Frustino J, Grewal JS, Loree TR. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for management of the N0 neck in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(2):101–8.
2. Boeve K, Schepman KP, Schuuring E, Roodenburg JLN, Halmos GB, van Dijk BAC, et al. High sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in a retrospective early stage oral cavity cancer cohort in the Northern Netherlands. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(4):1080–7.
3. Den Toom IJ, Heuveling DA, Flach GB, van Weert S, Karagozoglu KH, van Schie A, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage oral cavity cancer: the VU University Medical Center experience. Head Neck. 2015;37(4):573–8.
4. Schilling C, Stoeckli SJ, Haerle SK, Broglie MA, Huber GF, Sorensen JA, et al. Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT): 3 year results of sentinel node biopsy in oral cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(18):2777–84.
5. Liu M, Wang SJ, Yang X, Peng H. Diagnostic efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 66 studies. PLoS One. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170322.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献