The Drone, the Snake, and the Crystal: Manifesting Potency in 3D Digital Replicas of Living Heritage and Archaeological Places-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Drone, the Snake, and the Crystal: Manifesting Potency in 3D Digital Replicas of Living Heritage and Archaeological Places

Published:2022-12-02 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1555-8622
Container-title:Archaeologies
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch

Author:

Wessels Stephen^ORCID,Maape Sechaba,Schoville Benjamin J.,Wilkins Jayne

Abstract

AbstractCreating and sharing 3D digital replicas of archaeological sites online has become increasingly common. They are being integrated in excavation workflows, used to foster public engagement with the site, and provide communication and outreach of research, which now happen on digital media platforms. However, there has been little introspection by the community involved in the 3D documentation field, which has resulted in problematic practices. We critique the western paradigm of archaeological visualisation and propose recommendations for inclusive, decolonised visualisations of living heritage and archaeological places. To begin, we define in broad terms what an archaeological site is, and then we describe how these sites have been recorded and represented using the latest technology for digital re-production, namely laser scanning and photogrammetry. Following that we provide a critical analysis of current 3D visualisations of archaeological sites and develop an approach to ensure that the significance, meaning, and potency of archaeological and living heritage places are transferred to their digital replicas. Our case study at Ga-Mohana Hill in South Africa then offers practical approaches and methodologies that the fields of cultural heritage documentation and archaeological visualisation can employ to address their recurring issues as identified in the critical analysis. We present an online, interactive 3D digital replica of a living heritage and archaeological place that we believe responds appropriately to its political, cultural, and social context along with communicating its archaeological significance.

Funder

Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research Award

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Archeology

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11759-022-09460-3.pdf

Reference60 articles.

1. Amico, N., Ronzino, P., Vasallo, V., Miltiadous, N., Hermon, S., & Niccolucci, F. (2018). Theorizing authenticity—Practising reality: The 3D replica of the Kazaphani boat. In P. Di Giuseppantonio Di, F. G. Franco, & V. Vassallo (Eds.), Authenticity and cultural heritage in the age of 3D digital reproductions (pp. 111–122). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

2. Atalay, S. (2006). Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3), 280–310.

3. Athreya, S., & Ackermann, R. R. (2020). Colonialism and narratives of human origins in Asia Africa. In M. Porr & J. M. Matthews (Eds.), Interrogating human origins: Decolonisation and the deep past (pp. 72–95). Routledge.

4. Beaumont, P. B., & Morris, D. (1990). Guide to archaeological sites in the Northern Cape: Prepared for the Southern African Association of Archaeologists Post-conference Excursion, 9th–13th September 1990. Kimberley: McGregor Museum.

5. Bendicho, V.M.L.-M. (2013). International guidelines for virtual archaeology: The seville principles. In C. Corsi, B. Slapšak, & F. Vermeulen (Eds.), Good practice in archaeological diagnostics: Non-invasive survey of complex archaeological sites (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing.