Abstract
AbstractIn climate change mitigation, backcasting scenarios are often used for exploring options for achieving a single environmental goal, albeit at the expense of other goals. This paper assesses potential conflicts and synergies between multiple environmental policy goals based on four future scenarios on Swedish rural land use, assuming zero GHG emissions in 2060. The assessment shows that goal conflicts are apparent, and policy makers need to make trade-offs between goals. The choice of strategy for dealing with these trade-offs yields conflicts or synergies. The assessment shows that a transition to zero GHG emissions provides opportunities for Sweden to shift to carbon free land-use planning. Overall, there are alternative ways with different underlying assumptions to achieve zero GHG emissions, which will feed discussions on new opportunities to overcome multi-scale and multi-sectoral goal conflicts. Multi-target backcasting scenarios are considered more suited to account for the multi-dimensional aspects of goal conflicts. This requires a comprehensive multi-target backcasting approach, which combines the strengths of multicriteria analysis, nexus approaches and backcasting, for supporting a transition to zero GHG emissions.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Global and Planetary Change
Reference57 articles.
1. Agnolucci P, Ekins P, Iacopini G, Anderson K, Bows A, Mander S, Shackley S (2009) Different scenarios for achieving radical reduction in carbon emissions: a decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1652–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.005
2. Almstedt M, de Jong, J., Ebenhard, T., Hallgren L., (2006) Leder Målkonflikter till Ineffektiv Naturvård? [Do goal conflicts lead to ineffectiveenvironmental protection?] Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
3. Axelrod R (1967) Conflict of interest: an axiomatic approach. J Confl Resolut 11:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276701100107
4. Beise M, Rennings K (2005) Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecol Econ 52:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007
5. Beria P, Maltese I, Mariotti I (2012) Multicriteria versus cost benefit analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. Eur Transp Res Rev 4:137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0074-9
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献