Abstract
AbstractNatural protected areas (NPAs) in the Yucatan Peninsula favour the conservation of mangrove forests, which are valuable ecosystems for their provision of ecosystem services. However, mangroves are vulnerable to destruction due to natural and anthropogenic pressures. Therefore, it is important to assess their spatial and temporal dynamics and the potential for deforestation and recovery of cover. In this study, we analyse and model mangrove forest cover change in six NPAs of the Yucatan Peninsula by 2025. Predictions were made using the cellular automata method (CA-Markov) based on attributes that drive rates of change (obtained Kappa coefficients between 0.78 and 0.91). Anthropogenic development was the most dominant potential driver of land use and land cover change in all NPAs except the Flora and Fauna Protection Area-Yum Balam. During the period 2005–2015, the Biosphere Reserves-Petenes and Celestún showed the greatest mangrove loss, followed by the Flora and Fauna Protection Area-Nichupté. These processes changed for the simulated period (2015–2025), where an increase in mangrove cover is projected in these protected areas. Flora and Fauna Protection Area-Términos is the only protected area where a projected transition of mangroves to anthropogenic development has been identified. Therefore, it should be considered an area vulnerable to mangrove transformation and loss.
Funder
Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Adame MF, Teutli C, Santini NS, Caamal JP, Zaldívar-Jiménez A et al (2014) Root biomass and production of mangroves surrounding a karstic oligotrophic coastal lagoon. Wetlands 34:479–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0514-5
2. Baker W (1989) Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the boundary waters canoe area, Minnesota. Ecol Soc Am 70:23–35
3. Brun C, Cook AR, Lee JSH, Wich SA, Koh LP et al (2015) Analysis of deforestation and protected area effectiveness in Indonesia: a comparison of Bayesian spatial models. Glob Environ Chang 31:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.004
4. Castellanos-Basto B, Herrera-Silveira J, Bataller É, Rioja-Nieto R (2021) Local drivers associated to temporal spectral response of chlorophyll-a in mangrove leaves. Sustainability 13:4636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094636
5. Ceballos G, Díaz-Pardo E, Espinosa H, Flores-Villela Ó, García A et al (2009) Zonas críticas y de alto riesgo para la conservación de la biodiversidad de México. In: Sarukhán J, Kolef P, Carabias J, et al. (eds) Capital natural de México, vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. Conabio, CONABIO. Comisión nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la biodiversidad, México, D. F., pp 575–600