Abstract
AbstractNatural scientists are increasingly being encouraged to engage with local and Indigenous communities when carrying out research. However, these attempts at collaboration can repeatedly bring up challenges that have their root in how the different stakeholders relate to one another throughout the research process. This essay explores the experiences of the author, an early career researcher trained in the natural sciences, in her attempts to undertake interdisciplinary collaborative work with Sámi reindeer herders in Northern Europe. Whilst underpinned with good intent of creating decolonial, collaborative and locally useful research, the practice of this work lacked awareness of how to do so effectively, leading to multiple challenges in the project. This was largely due to the author having an inadequate understanding of key relevant discourses, including research fatigue, ethics of co-authorship, mismatching timelines, mismatching expectations between academics and relevant communities and power dynamics in interpersonal relationships. These are topics that have been explored in-depth in fields such as human geography, social sciences and anthropology, yet they are insufficiently considered in the natural sciences as a whole. The purpose of this essay is two-fold. The first is to signpost natural scientists wishing to engage in collaborative research towards key texts and concepts that could aid their work. It is not an extensive review, but rather what is hopefully an accessible introduction. It is, quite simply, an essay that the author would have appreciated having access to before undertaking her work. The second is to contribute to a wider discussion around the need for a more diverse and decolonial training in the natural sciences, so we all can respond to the many changes currently occurring on our planet using knowledge generated from well-informed, meaningful and effective collaborations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Global and Planetary Change
Reference134 articles.
1. Absolon K (2011) Kaandossiwin: how we come to know. Fernwood Publishing, Winnipeg, MB
2. Aikenhead GS, Ogawa M (2007) Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 2:539–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8
3. Albert TF (2001) The influence of Harry Brower, Sr., an Iñupiaq Eskimo hunter, on the bowhead whale research program conducted at the UIC-NARL facility by the North Slope Borough. In: Norton DW (ed) Fifty More Years Below Zero. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, pp 265–278
4. Andersen SS, Atle M (1985) Conflict and local mobilization: the Alta hydropower project. Acta Sociol 28(4):317–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F000169938502800402
5. Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environ Chang 21(3):995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献