Comparison of 2D and autostereoscopic 3D visualization during mixed reality simulation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of 2D and autostereoscopic 3D visualization during mixed reality simulation

Published:2023-03-30 Issue:9 Volume:18 Page:1679-1686
ISSN:1861-6429
Container-title:International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Int J CARS

Author:

Vörös Viktor^ORCID,De Smet Jef^ORCID,Ourak Mouloud^ORCID,Poliakov Vladimir^ORCID,Deprest Jan^ORCID,Kimpe Tom^ORCID,Vander Poorten Emmanuel^ORCID

Funder

Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Biomedical Engineering

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11548-023-02876-4.pdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G (2009) The current status of laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55(5):1089–1105

2. Alleblas CCJ, de Man AM, van den Haak L, Vierhout ME, Jansen FW, Nieboer TE (2017) Prevalence of Musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery. Ann Surg 266(6):905–920. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002223

3. Hamad GG, Curet M (2010) Minimally invasive surgery. Am J Surg 199(2):263–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2009.05.008

4. Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2009.10.017

5. Roh HF, Nam SH, Kim JM (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 13(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191628