Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Many surgical complications can be prevented by careful operation planning and preoperative evaluation of the anatomical features. Virtual dental implant planning in three-dimensional stereoscopic virtual reality environment has advantages over three-dimensional projections on two-dimensional screens. In the virtual environment, the anatomical areas of the body can be assessed and interacted with in six degrees-of-freedom. Our aim was to make a preliminary evaluation of how professional users perceive the use of the virtual environment on their field.
Methods
We prepared a novel implementation of a virtual dental implant planning system and conducted a small-scale user study with four dentomaxillofacial radiologists to evaluate the usability of direct and indirect interaction in a planning task.
Results
We found that all four participants ranked direct interaction, planning the implant placement without handles, to be better than the indirect condition where the implant model had handles.
Conclusion
The radiologists valued the three-dimensional environment for three-dimensional object manipulation even if usability issues of the handles affected the feel of use and the evaluation results. Direct interaction was seen as easy, accurate, and natural.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Biomedical Engineering
Reference31 articles.
1. Unsal G-S, Turkyilmaz I, Lakhia S (2020) Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with cad/cam surgical guides: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 12(4):409
2. da Silva Salomão GV, Chun EP, Panegaci RDS, Santos FT (2021) Analysis of digital workflow in implantology. Case Reports in Dentistry 2021
3. Kernen F, Kramer J, Wanner L, Wismeijer D, Nelson K, Flügge T (2020) A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery-data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. BMC Oral Health 20(1):1–10
4. Harrell WE Jr (2007) Three-dimensional diagnosis and treatment planning: the use of 3d facial imaging and 3d cone beam ct in orthodontics and dentistry. Australas Dent Pract 18:102–13
5. Li Z, Kiiveri M, Rantala J, Raisamo R (2021) Evaluation of haptic virtual reality user interfaces for medical marking on 3d models. Int J Human-Comput Stud 147:102561
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献