Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
In-depth knowledge about surgical processes is a crucial prerequisite for future systems in operating rooms and the advancement of standards and patient safety in surgery. A holistic approach is required, but research in the field of surgical instrument tables, standardized instrument setups and involved personnel, such as nurses, is sparse in general. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether there is an existing standard within clinics for an instrument table setup. We also evaluate to which extent it is known to the personnel and whether it is accepted.
Materials and Methods
The study makes use of the Nosco Trainer, a scrub nurse training and simulation system developed to analyze various aspects of the workplace of scrub nurses. The system contains a virtual instrument table, which is used to perform and record instrument table setups. We introduce a metric which delivers a measurable score for the similarity of surgical instrument table setups. The study is complemented with a questionnaire covering related aspects.
Results
Fifteen scrub nurses of the Otolaryngology departments at three clinics in Germany and Switzerland performed a table setup for a Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery intervention and completed the questionnaire. The analysis of the developed metric with a leave one out cross-validation correctly allocated 14 of the 15 participants to their clinic.
Discussion
In contrast to the identified similarities of table setups within clinics with the collected data, only a third of the participants confirmed in the questionnaire that there is an existing table setup standard for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery interventions in their facility, but almost three quarters would support a written standard and acknowledge its possible benefits for trainees and new entrants in the operating room.
Conclusions
The structured analysis of the surgical instrument table using a data-driven metric for comparison is a novel approach to gain deeper knowledge about intra-operative processes. The insights can contribute to patient safety by improving the workflow between surgeon and scrub nurse and also open the way for goal-oriented standardization.
Funder
sächsisches staatsministerium für wissenschaft und kunst
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Biomedical Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. Weisz G, Cambrosio A, Keating P, Knaapen L, Schlich T, Tournay VJ (2007) The emergence of clinical practice guidelines. Milbank Q 85(4):691–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00505.x
2. Lemke HU, Vannier MW (2006) The operating room and the need for an IT infrastructure and standards. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(3):117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0051-7
3. Neumuth T, Liebmann P, Wiedemann P, Meixensberger J (2012) Others: surgical workflow management schemata for cataract procedures. Methods Inf Med 51(5):371–382
4. Neumuth T, Jannin P, Schlomberg J, Meixensberger J, Wiedemann P, Burgert O (2011) Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(1):59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0475-y
5. Neumuth T, Schumann S, Straub G, Jannin P, Meixensberger J, Dietz A, Lemke H, Burgert O (2006) Visualization options for surgical workflows. In: CARS, vol 1, pp 438–440. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00341631/