The “true” acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Different factors can lead to inconsistencies in measurement for the acetabular version using 2D axial CT-cuts. We have defined a “true” anteversion angle (AV angle) in the physiological position of the pelvis in 3D with the largest European population measured to our knowledge. Material and methods We analyzed 258 hemipelvises and created 3D models. We compared the results of our AV angle 3D method with the cross-sectional cuts of the same acetabula. We included factors like side, sex, body mass index, and patient positioning. Results Overall, the mean (SD) AV angle was 16.1 (5.9)° as measured with the 3D method and 22.0 (6.0)° as measured with the 2D method (p < 0.0001). Measured with both the 3D and the 2D method, the AV angle was significantly larger in female than in male individuals (p < 0.0001). In the 2D method, the AV angle estimation was influenced by the pelvic tilt. Conclusion We propose a more accurate method for the measurement of the AV angle of the acetabulum in a 3D model that is not influenced by patient positioning or pelvic tilt. We provide a computational model that will facilitate operative decisions and improve preoperative planning. We confirm that 3D measurement should be the gold standard in measuring the acetabular anteversion.