Can we do real inquiry online? Influence of real-time data collection on students’ views of inquiry in an online, multi-site masters’ degree on environmental education

Author:

Castillo-Hernández Francisco-JoséORCID,Jiménez-Liso María-RutORCID,Couso DignaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn a previous study we detected that a number of inquiry stages (data collection, analysis and conclusions) went unnoticed by the students of an in situ joint online/onsite master’s degree via online teaching. In this paper we analyse the effect of improved instruction, in which students fully experienced and became aware of all the stages that comprise the inquiry-based teaching approach. In the article we show the differences between the initial and improved instruction. The comparison of student comments as exhibited in the online class diary forum between the initial and improved instruction has allowed us to analyse the influence of this improvement in the level of depth of the students’ discourse. Two codings have been employed to analyse the forums: the first (deductive) detected which stages of inquiry appeared in the comments. The second (inductive) involved the recoding of each of the previously classified comments based on five levels of communicative quality that emerged. Our main finding was that as well as being more aware of the different stages of inquiry, the students of the improved investigation were able to explain and identify them with specific examples. In other words, the investment of time in developing each of the stages in question helped them to define, afford reality to, and increase the explicative quality of their comments.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

University of Almeria

Generalitat de Catalunya

Junta de Andalucía

Universidad de Almería

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference47 articles.

1. Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5

2. Chang, H. Y. (2013). Teacher guidance to mediate student inquiry through interactive dynamic visualizations. Instructional Science, 41(5), 895–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9257-y

3. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.

4. Couso, D. (2014). De la moda de “aprender indagando” a la indagación para modelizar: Una reflexión crítica. In M. Á. Heras, A. Lorca, B. Vázquez, A. M. Wamba, & R. Jiménez (Eds.), Investigación y transferencia para una educación en ciencias: Un reto emocionante (pp. 1–28). Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de Huelva.

5. Dawson, P. (2015). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3