Abstract
AbstractIn engineering education laboratories serve as experiential learning aimed at engaging students. The past decades saw an increased use of online laboratories, including virtual and remote labs. Remote labs, providing online interfaces to physical labs, allow students to conduct experiments with real-world equipment anywhere and at any time. However, this advantage challenges active student engagement. Little evidence is available on effective pedagogies for student engagement in remote labs. This paper aims to identify how a remote lab assignment based on active learning pedagogy in higher engineering education supports student engagement, with the overarching aim to promote students’ transfer skills from theory to practice. Our research question, “What impact does an active learning pedagogy have on students’ engagement with a remote lab?“, was answered with a case study of two courses on systems and control in higher engineering education. Data included digital traces, course evaluations, interviews, and observations. Students reported how remote labs, to be used anywhere at any time, require self-regulation and scheduling of experiments. However, accompanying open-ended lab assignments encouraged students to engage with the lab and the theoretical content of the course by creating a ‘need-to-know.’ Our results furthermore suggest the need for a structured arrangement of open-ended lab assignment, lab preparation, teamwork supporting peer learning and discussion, progress meetings focused on feedback and formative assessment, and reports focused on reflection. Engagement can be strengthened by support for students before and during the experiments, clear signposting about the experiment and lab set-up, and pre-structuring of lab activities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb’s experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of engineering Education, 98(3), 283–294
2. Apul, D. S., & Philpott, S. M. (2011). Use of outdoor living spaces and Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning in sustainability engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137(2), 69–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000051
3. Association of Universities in The Netherlands (2014). The Netherlands Code of Conduct for Academic Practice. Retrieved from December 21, 2017, http://www.vsnu.nl/en_GB/netherlands-code-of-conduct-scientific-practice.html
4. Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Philadelphia: Open University Press
5. Bernhard, J. (2010). Insightful learning in the laboratory: Some experiences from 10 years of designing and using conceptual labs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 271–287
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献