Abstract
AbstractThe use of biometrics for the creation of visual ‘body types’ needs continued criminological engagement. This article discusses Lombroso’s practice of typing ‘born criminals’ vis-à-vis genomic phenotyping used to identify potential suspects. Both are prevalent examples of scientizing police and legal work. While Lombroso draws on anatomy to explain causes of criminal behavior, phenotyping is based on genomic and physiognomic correlation to help identify suspects. Despite these differences, both forms of visualizing bodies, we argue, are also a practice of marking. Especially in the context of crime and crime control, marking is a sensitive and political practice. Since typing is embedded in criminology, our analysis is also a critical engagement with criminology itself.
Funder
European Research Council
University of Oslo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Aas, Katja Franko (2006) ‘The body does not lie’: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime, Media, Culture 2(2): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006065401
2. Abu El-Haj, Nadia (2007) “The Genetic Reinscription of Race.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 283-300.
3. Amoore, Louise (2011) “Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times.” Theory, Culture & Society 28(6) 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430.
4. Associated Press & Dailymail.com Reporter (2017) Man is Arrested Six Years After a Mother and Her Three-Year-Old Daughter Were Brutally Murdered in Cold Case Cracked by New DNA Technology. Accessed at 4 May 2023: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4365906/Police-make-arrest-cold-case-slayings-mom-daughter.html.
5. Becker, Peter, Wetzell, Richard (2006). Criminals and Their Scientists: The History of Criminology in International Perspective. Publications of the German Historical Institute. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.