Abstract
AbstractAdvancing women’s empowerment and gender equality in agriculture is a recognised development goal, also within crop breeding. Increasingly, breeding teams are expected to use ‘market-based’ approaches to design more ‘demand-led’ and ‘gender-responsive’ crop varieties. Based on an institutional ethnography that includes high-profile development-oriented breeding initiatives, we unpack these terms using perspectives from political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies. By conceptualising the market as an ongoing, relational performance made up of discourses, practices and human and nonhuman actors, we trace how the market is understood as an effective socioeconomic institution for soliciting demand, but also becomes a normative agenda. Construed as a demand variable, the relational and structural dimensions of gender are rendered less visible, which might strengthen rather than transform power relations’ status quo. On the other hand, a feminist science and technology perspective broadens the field of vision not only to the gendered dimensions of crop breeding, but also to the nonhuman actors, such as the crops and traits falling outside the market sphere of interest. By putting political agronomy and feminist science and technology studies into conversation, the article contributes to the development of a feminist political agronomy.
Funder
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference177 articles.
1. Acevedo, M., K. Pixley, N. Zinyengere, S. Meng, H.A. Tufan, K. Cichy, L. Bizikova, K. Isaacs, K. Ghezzi-Kopel, and J. Porciello. 2020. A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low-and middle-income countries. Nature Plants 6: 1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00783-z.
2. Akram-Lodhi, H. 2013. Hungry for change: Farmers, food justice and the agrarian question. Halifax: Fernwood.
3. Almekinders, C.J.M., K. Beumer, M. Hauser, M. Misiko, M. Gatto, A.O. Nkurumwa, and O. Erenstein. 2019. Understanding the relations between farmers’ seed demand and research methods: The challenge to do better. Outlook on Agriculture 48 (1): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019827028.
4. Altan-Olcay, Ö. 2015. The entrepreneurial woman in development programs: Thinking through class differences. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 23 (3): 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv013.
5. Amadiume, I. 1987. Male daughters, female husbands: Gender and sex in an African society. London: Zed Books.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献