Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference77 articles.
1. Bain, C., and T. Dandachi. 2014. Governing GMOs: The (counter) movement for mandatory and voluntary non-GMO labels. Sustainability 6 (12): 9456–9476.
2. Bain, C., and T. Selfa. 2017. Non-GMOs vs. organic labels: Purity or process guarantees in a GMO contaminated landscape. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (4): 805–818.
3. Bortesi, L., and R. Fischer. 2015. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnology Advances 33 (1): 41–52.
4. Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. van Lente. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298.
5. Brasher, P., and S. Davies. 2018. Will new regulations stifle innovation in plant and animal breeding? Agri-Pulse Communications, 5 February.
https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/10564-will-new-regulations-stifle-innovation-in-plant-and-animal-breeding
. Accessed 22 Oct 2018.
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Study on Genetically Engineered Foods: Need, Benefits, Risk, and Current Knowledge;Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics;2024-07-17
2. Vanguard Visions of Vertical Farming: Envisaging and Contesting an Emerging Food Production System;Science, Technology, & Human Values;2024-04-04
3. Who and what gets recognized in digital agriculture: agriculture 4.0 at the intersectionality of (Dis)Ableism, labor, and recognition justice;Agriculture and Human Values;2024-03-16
4. Democratization through precision technologies? Unveiling power, participation, and property rights in the agricultural bioeconomy;Frontiers in Political Science;2024-03-08
5. New genomic techniques, old divides: Stakeholder attitudes towards new biotechnology regulation in the EU and UK;PLOS ONE;2024-03-06