Abstract
AbstractAs the term regenerative agriculture caught fire in public discourse around 2019, it was promptly labelled a buzzword. While the buzzword accusation tends to be regarded as negative, these widely used terms also reflect an important area of growing public interest. Exploring a buzzword can thus help us understand our current moment and offer insights to paths forward. In this study, we explored how and why different individuals and groups adopt certain key terms or buzzwords, in this case the term “regenerative agriculture”. We used an interpretivist approach to understand how “regenerative agriculture” is being constructed, interpreted, understood, and employed, drawing from 19 semi-structured interviews conducted with farmers, researchers, private companies, and NGO/nonprofits. Several interviewees felt that regenerative agriculture is making an important societal shift in thinking towards addressing major issues like climate change and parity in our food and agricultural systems. However, farmers in particular felt that the term is being greenwashed, coopting the work they do, and even diluting the meaning. We also found that regenerative agriculture is being advanced as mobilizing “win-wins”—for farmers, for consumers, for society—but that this discourse may be veiling the political and economic agendas of the big companies using the term. Our findings further illustrated the debates over standardizing the term regenerative agriculture, with some contending that there should be room for “continuous improvement” but others felt it is meaningless without a definition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Angara, Galina, and K. Ruka. 2020. and Kamea Chayne. Whitewashed hope: A message from 10 + Indigenous leaders and organizations: Regenerative agriculture and permaculture offer narrow solutions to the climate crisis. Cultural Survival. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/whitewashed-hope-message-10-indigenous-leaders-and-organizations.
2. Bless, Anja, Federico Davila, and Roel Plant. 2023. A genealogy of sustainable agriculture narratives: implications for the transformative potential of regenerative agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 40(4): 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10444-4.
3. Brazeau, Mark. 2021. Regenerative agriculture: the movement dedicated to unseating intensive, industrial farming by claiming it has comprehensive sustainability advantages. Genetic Literacy Projecthttps://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021/05/17/regenerative-agriculture-the-movement-dedicated-to-unseating-intensive-industrial-farming-by-claiming-it-has-comprehensive-sustainability-advantages/.
4. Cairns, Rose, and Anna Krzywoszynska. 2016. Anatomy of a buzzword: the emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates. Environmental Science & Policy 64: 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007.
5. Carlisle, Liz. 2022. Healing grounds: Climate, Justice, and the deep roots of regenerative farming. Island.