Abstract
AbstractThe magnitude of public concerns about agricultural innovations has often been underestimated, as past examples, such as pesticides, nanotechnology, and cloning, demonstrate. Indeed, studies have proven that the agricultural sector presents an area of tension and often attracts skepticism concerning new technologies. Digital technologies have become increasingly popular in agriculture. Yet there are almost no investigations on the public acceptance of digitalization in agriculture so far. Our online survey provides initial insights to reduce this knowledge gap. The sample (n = 2012) represents the German population in terms of gender, age (minimum 18 years), education and size of place of residence. Results showed that if the potential of digital farming technologies (DFT) regarding animal welfare and environmental protection was described, respondents reacted positively. Thus, the general attitudes of respondents toward the benefits of DFT were mostly positive. The approval to increasing adoption rates of particular DFT by providing subsidies was also high. Linear regression models showed that the dominant positive influences on respondents’ attitudes toward the benefits of DFT were a generally positive attitude toward farming and a strong trust in farmers in Germany. Confronting respondents with pictures showing DFT resulted in many spontaneous negative associations and general criticism of agricultural production. The latter holds true for DFT in animal husbandry in particular. However, as agriculture as a whole is criticized by many groups in Germany, it is unlikely that benefits from digitalization will significantly increase the public acceptance of agriculture as a whole.
Funder
Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten
Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference111 articles.
1. Alrøe, H.F., and E.S. Kristensen. 2002. Towards a systemic research methodology in agriculture: Rethinking the role of values in science. Agriculture and Human Values 19: 3–23.
2. Amin, L., H. Hashim, N.M. Sidik, Z.A. Zainol, and N. Anuar. 2011. Public attitude towards modern biotechnology. African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (58): 12409–12417.
3. Asveld, L., J. Ganzevles, and P. Osseweijer. 2015. Trustworthiness and responsible research and innovation: The case of the bio-economy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28: 571–588.
4. Banhazi, T.M., H. Lehr, J.L. Black, H. Crabtree, P. Schofield, M. Tscharke, and D. Berckmans. 2012. Precision livestock farming: An international review of scientific and commercial aspects. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 5 (3): 1–9.
5. Bauer, M.W. 2002. Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: A cultivation analysis. Public Understanding of Science 11 (2): 93–111.
Cited by
75 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献