Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, the long-standing questions of why, how, and which farm families continue farming in the face of ongoing changes have increasingly been studied through the resilience lens. While this body of work is providing updated and novel insights, two limitations, a focus on macro-level challenges faced by the farm operation and a mismatch between the scale of challenges and resilience measures, likely limit our understanding of the factors at play. We use the example of medical economic vulnerability, a micro-level challenge traditionally confined to the household sphere of the agri-family system, as a way to call attention to these limitations. Focusing on United States (U.S.) farm households, we assess: (1) To what extent are they experiencing medical economic vulnerability when using objective and subjective outcome measures? (2) Which demographic and farm characteristics are associated with experiencing medical economic vulnerability? (3) What is the association between institutional arrangements and medical economic vulnerability? Our analysis of over 900 surveys coupled with a conceptual framework merging complementary insights from three bodies of literature revealed seemingly large differences in the prevalence of medical economic vulnerability across the objective and subjective measures with the subjective measure indicating a general sentiment of medical economic vulnerability in a majority of respondents. Conversely, limited variations were noted in who experiences medical vulnerability on the basis of demographic and farm characteristics, with stronger associations being connected to the households’ health insurance arrangements. We conclude with three implications of our findings for the farm resilience literature.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
The Ohio State University Initiative for Food and Agricultural Transformation Discovery Theme
Marshfield Clinic Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference99 articles.
1. Ahearn, M., H. El-Osta, and A. Mishra. 2013. Considerations in work choices of U.S. farm households: The role of health insurance. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 38 (1): 19–33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23496736. Accessed 11 Feb 2022
2. Ahearn, M., J. Williamson, and N. Black. 2015. Implications of health care reform for farm businesses and families. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37 (2): 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppu030.
3. Akram-Lodhi, A.H., and C. Kay. 2010a. Surveying the agrarian question (Part 1): Unearthing foundations, exploring diversity. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498838.
4. Akram-Lodhi, A.H., and C. Kay. 2010b. Surveying the agrarian question (Part 2): Current debates and beyond. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066151003594906.
5. Alam, K., and A. Mahal. 2014. Economic impacts of health shocks on households in low and middle income countries: A review of the literature. Globalization and Health 10 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-10-21.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献