Abstract
AbstractLocal food systems can have economic and social benefits by providing income for producers and improving community connections. Ongoing global climate change and the acute COVID-19 pandemic crisis have shown the importance of building equity and resilience in local food systems. We interviewed ten stakeholders from organizations and institutions in a U.S. midwestern city exploring views on past, current, and future conditions to address the following two objectives: 1) Assess how local food system equity and resilience were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and 2) Examine how policy and behavior changes could support greater equity and resilience within urban local food systems. We used the Community Capitals Framework to organize interviewees’ responses for qualitative analyses of equity and resilience. Four types of community capital were emphasized by stakeholders: cultural and social, natural, and political capital. Participants stated that the local food system in this city is small; more weaknesses in food access, land access, and governance were described than were strengths in both pre- and post-pandemic conditions. Stakeholder responses also reflected lack of equity and resilience in the local food system, which was most pronounced for cultural and social, natural and political capitals. However, local producers’ resilience during the pandemic, which we categorized as human capital, was a notable strength. An improved future food system could incorporate changes in infrastructure (e.g., food processing), markets (e.g., values-based markets) and cultural values (e.g., valuing local food through connections between local producers and consumers). These insights could inform policy and enhance community initiatives and behavior changes to build more equitable and resilient local food systems in urban areas throughout the U.S. Midwest.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Alattar, Manar. 2021. Eating inequity: The injustice that brings us our food. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 10: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.103.003.
2. Alkon, Alison Hope, and Teresa Marie Mares. 2012. Food sovereignty in US food movements: Radical visions and neoliberal constraints. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9356-z.
3. Alkon, Alison Hope, Sarah Bowen, Yuki Kato, and Kara Alexis Young. 2020. Unequally vulnerable: A food justice approach to racial disparities in COVID-19 cases. Agriculture and Human Values 37. Springer Netherlands: 535–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10110-z.
4. Bedsworth, Louise, Dan Cayan, Guido Franco, Leah Fisher, and Sonya Ziaja. 2018. Statewide summary report: California’s fourth climate change assessment. California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, California Energy Commission, California Public Utilities Commission. Available at: https://www.climateassessment.ca.gov/. Accessed 13 Feb 2024.
5. Bellamy, Angelina Sanderson, Ella Furness, Poppy Nicol, Hannah Pitt, and Alice Taherzadeh. 2021. Shaping more resilient and just food systems: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ambio 50. Springer Netherlands: 782–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01532-y.