Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we analyse the tensions associated with the emergence of microorganism-based agricultural inputs in two Latin American countries, Brazil and Mexico. More specifically, we examine the ways in which these technologies, which are based on the use of living organisms, leave public microbiology research laboratories and are further developed by manufacturers or farmers. To this end, we draw on the concept of the ‘laboratorisation’ of society, part of the actor-network theory. We show that the emergence of these technologies is currently facing a number of challenges, due to the risks associated with their biological nature and the difficulty involved in establishing production processes as reliable as those used in reference laboratories. Whether produced by companies or on farms, the quality and safety of the practices and of these products are the subject of debate, as well as the focus of scientific, economic and political scrutiny. These microbiological inputs are evidence for the transformation of the relationship between science, industry, users and politics that is taking place around the emergence of alternatives to synthetic chemical inputs in agriculture, and more broadly, about the use of microbiological resources in agriculture.
Funder
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Gobierno de México
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Akrich, M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, eds. W. Bijker, and J. Law. 205–224. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
2. Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002. The key to success in innovation. Part 1: The art of intressement. International Journal of Innovation Management 6(2): 187–206.
3. Ankrah, S., and O. Al-Tabbaa. 2015. Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31(3): 387–408.
4. Barua, M. 2016. Lively commodities and encounter value. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(4): 725–744.
5. Barua, M. 2017. Nonhuman labour, encounter value, spectacular accumulation: The geographies of a lively commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42(2): 274–288.