Abstract
AbstractThe nature of farming is – still – an essentially biological, and thus volatile, system, which poses substantial challenges to its integration into financialized capitalism. Financial investors often seek stability and predictability of returns that are hardly compatible with agriculture – but which are increasingly seen as achievable through data and digital farming technologies. This paper investigates how farmland investment brokers engage with, perceive, and produce farming data for their investors within a co-constructive process. Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’ for investment, I argue, has material and immaterial components: it includes the re-imagination of farming as a financial asset that delivers reliable income streams for investors; and the re-engineering of farmland’s concrete materialities with digital farming technologies. Farmland investment brokers develop investor-suitable farmland imaginaries, underpinned by storytelling as well as the calculative ‘evidence’ of (digital) data. At the same time, digital technologies have become a key tool for transforming farms into ‘investment grade assets’ endowed with the rich data on farm performance and financial returns requested by investors. I conclude that the assetization and digitization of farmland need to be seen as closely intertwined and mutually reinforcing processes and identify key areas for future research on this intersection.
Funder
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference79 articles.
1. Appadurai, A. 1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: Appadurai, A.(ed.) The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–63.
2. Besedovsky, N. 2018. Uncertain meanings of risk. In Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives, and calculation in the economy, eds. J. Beckert, and R. Bronk, 236–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Birch, K. 2017. Rethinking value in the bio-economy: finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science Technology & Human Values 42 (3): 460–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916661633.
4. Birch, K. 2023. Reflexive expectations in innovation financing: an analysis of venture capital as a mode of valuation. Social Studies of Science 53 (1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221118372.
5. Birch, K., and F. Muniesa, eds. 2020. Assetization: turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. MIT Press.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献