Abstract
AbstractAgricultural-technology (ag-tech) and agroecology both promise a better farming future. Ag-tech seeks to improve the food system through the development of high-tech tools such as sensors, digital platforms, and robotic harvesters, with many ag-tech start-ups promising to deliver increased agricultural productivity while also enhancing food system sustainability. Agroecology incorporates diverse cropping systems, low external resource inputs, indigenous and farmer knowledge, and is increasingly associated with political calls for a more just food system. Recently, demand has grown for the potentially groundbreaking benefits of their convergence, with the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) attempting just such a union. Building on its combined expertise in engineering and agroecology, as well as a longstanding reputation as a socially progressive institution, university administrators believe that UCSC could produce a unique, socially just form of ag-tech designed for small, low-resource farmers—a rare contribution given ag-tech’s tendency to cater primarily to large-scale agribusiness. This paper examines the complexities of uniting agroecology and ag-tech through interviews with agroecologists, engineers, and social scientists involved in UCSC’s ag-tech initiative. Within the setting of a historically radical yet neoliberalizing university, I find that significant epistemic and structural barriers exist for agroecology and ag-tech to come together on an even playing field. This case study contributes to broader discussions of the future of food and farming by focusing on the contours and challenges of a widely called-for agricultural collaboration, highlighting its difficulty but also areas of possibility in a particularly rich, contested context.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference89 articles.
1. Albert, Mathieu, and Wendy McGuire. 2014. Understanding change in academic knowledge production in a neoliberal era. In Political power and social theory, ed. Scott Frickel and David J. Hess, 33–57. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
2. Bellon Maurel, Véronique, and Christian Huyghe. 2017. Putting agricultural equipment and digital technologies at the cutting edge of agroecology. OCL 24: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017028.
3. Bellon Maurel, Véronique, Bonnet, Pascal, Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle, Brossard, Ludovic , Labarthe, Pierre, et al. 2022. Digital technology and agroecology: opportunities to explore, challenges to overcome. Agriculture and Digital Technology: Getting the most out of digital technology to contribute to the transition to sustainable agriculture and food systems, White book INRIA, 978-2-72611310-3. hal-03606035v2
4. Bellwood-Howard, Imogen, and Santiago Ripoll. 2020. Divergent understandings of agroecology in the era of the African green revolution. Outlook on Agriculture 49: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020930353.
5. Bergland, Brita. 2018. The incompatibility of neoliberal university structures and interdisciplinary knowledge: A feminist slow scholarship critique. Educational Philosophy and Theory 50: 1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1341297.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献