Abstract
AbstractOne of the major challenges facing agricultural and food systems today is the loss of agrobiodiversity. Considering the current impasse of preventing the worldwide loss of crop diversity, this paper highlights the possibility for a radical reorientation of current legal seed frameworks that could provide more space for alternative seed systems to evolve which centre on norms that support on-farm agrobiodiversity. Understanding the underlying norms that shape seed commons are important, since norms both delimit and contribute to what ultimately will constitute the seeds and who will ultimately have access to the seeds and thus to the extent to which agrobiodiversity is upheld and supported. This paper applies a commoning approach to explore the underpinning norms of a Swedish seed commons initiative and discusses the potential for furthering agrobiodiversity in the context of wider legal and authoritative discourses on seed enclosure. The paper shows how the seed commoning system is shaped and protected by a particular set of farming norms, which allows for sharing seeds among those who adhere to the norms but excludes those who will not. The paper further illustrates how farmers have been able to navigate fragile legal and economic pathways to collectively organize around landrace seeds, which function as an epistemic farming community, that maintain landraces from the past and shape new landraces for the present, adapted to diverse agro-ecological environments for low-input agriculture. The paper reveals how the ascribed norms to the seed commons in combination with the current seed laws set a certain limit to the extent to which agrobiodiversity is upheld and supported and discusses why prescriptions of “getting institutions right” for seed governance are difficult at best, when considering the shifting socio-nature of seeds. To further increase agrobiodiversity, the paper suggests future seed laws are redirected to the sustenance of a proliferation of protected seed commoning systems that can supply locally adapted plant material for diverse groups of farmers and farming systems.
Funder
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Adhikari, K., E. Bikundo, X. Chacko, S. Chapman, F. Humphries, H. Johnson, E. Keast, C. Lawson, J. Malbon, and D. Robinson et al. 2021. What should farmers’ rights look like? The possible substance of a right. Agronomy 11(2): 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020367.
2. Allkorn. 2022. Stadgar för Allkorn/Statutes for Allkorn 2004. http://allkorn.se/ (Accessed: 5 May 2022).
3. Balázs, B., and G. Aistara. 2018. The emergence, dynamics and agency of social innovation in seed exchange networks. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v24i3.9.
4. Batur, F., R. Bocci, and B. Bartha. 2021. ‘Marketing Farmers’ Varieties in Europe: Encouraging Pathways with Missing Links for the Recognition and Support of Farmer Seed Systems’, Agronomy 2021, Vol. 11, Page 2159. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 11(11), p. 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY11112159.
5. Bollier, David, and Silke Helfrich. 2012. The wealth of the commons: a world beyond market and state. Amherst: Leveller.