Abstract
AbstractIn many high-income countries, agricultural land is highly concentrated in a few hands, but detailed knowledge of ownership structures is limited. We examined land ownership structures and agricultural land concentration for the entire state of Brandenburg, Germany (1.3 million ha), using cadastral and company network data. Our aim was to characterise all landowners, analyse the degree of ownership concentration, and examine the role of the largest landowners in more detail. We found a high fragmentation of ownership among 185,000 different owners. Most of the land was owned by individuals not active in agriculture and only a third of the land was owned by farmers and other agricultural actors. Absentee ownership covered a quarter of the land. Ownership concentration was low to moderate in most regions and reached high levels in only a few areas. The largest owners were public institutions, private investors and nature protection institutions. Areas where public institutions owned a lot of land showed high concentrations, but also some areas where private landowners owned a lot of land. In summary, our analysis provides rare information on the concentration of agricultural land ownership in a large region. Such analysis facilitates better justification and design of policies that regulate agricultural land markets.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Transformationsökonomien (IAMO)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Appel, F., Balmann, A., Filler, G., Jänicke, C., Odening, M., and Schmidt, L. 2023. Stellungnahme zum Entwurf des Gesetzes zum Erhalt und zur Verbesserung der brandenburgischen Agrarstruktur (FORLand Policy Brief No. 5). https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.334725.
2. Ashwood, L., J. Canfield, M. Fairbairn, and K. de Master. 2022a. What owns the land: The corporate organization of farmland investment. The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (2): 233–262.
3. Ashwood, L., A. Pilny, J. Canfield, M. Jamila, and R. Thomson. 2022b. From Big Ag to Big Finance: A market network approach to power in agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 39 (4): 1421–1434.
4. Azar, J., M.C. Schmalz, and I. Tecu. 2018. Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership. The Journal of Finance 73 (4): 1513–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12698.
5. Bailey, C., A. Gopaul, R. Thomson, and A. Gunnoe. 2021. Taking Goldschmidt to the woods: Timberland ownership and quality of life in Alabama. Rural Sociology 86 (1): 50–80.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献