Abstract
AbstractThe emergence of the “4th Industrial Revolution,” i.e. the convergence of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, advanced materials, and bioengineering technologies, could accelerate socioeconomic insecurities and anxieties or provide beneficial alternatives to the status quo. In the post-Covid-19 era, the entities that are best positioned to capitalize on these innovations are large firms, which use digital platforms and big data to orchestrate vast ecosystems of users and extract market share across industry sectors. Nonetheless, these technologies also have the potential to democratize ownership, broaden political-economic participation, and reduce environmental harms. We articulate the potential sociotechnical pathways in this high-stakes crossroads by analyzing cellular agriculture, an exemplary 4th Industrial Revolution technology that synergizes computer science, biopharma, tissue engineering, and food science to grow cultured meat, dairy, and egg products from cultured cells and/or genetically modified yeast. Our exploration of this space involved multi-sited ethnographic research in both (a) the cellular agriculture community and (b) alternative economic organizations devoted to open source licensing, member-owned cooperatives, social financing, and platform business models. Upon discussing how these latter approaches could potentially facilitate alternative sociotechnical pathways in cellular agriculture, we reflect upon the broader implications of this work with respect to the 4th Industrial Revolution and the enduring need for public policy reform.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference142 articles.
1. Ajena, F. 2019. Agriculture 3.0 or (smart) agroecology? P2P foundation. https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/agriculture-3-0-or-smart-agroecology/2019/07/11. Accessed 21 July 2020.
2. Akom, A., S. Aekta, A. Nakai, and T. Cruz. 2016. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) 2.0: How technological innovation and digital organizing sparked a food revolution in East Oakland. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29: 1287–1307.
3. Barrett, H., and D.C. Rose. 2020. Perceptions of the fourth agricultural revolution: What’s in, what’s out, and what consequences are anticipated? Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12324.
4. Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Baker, D., A Jayadev, and J.E. Stiglitz. 2017. Innovation, intellectual property, and development: A better set of approaches for the 21st century. AccessIBSA: Innovation & Access to Medicines in India, Brazil & South Africa.
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献