Abstract
AbstractThe objective of this study was to determine genetic potentials in eight sets of cowpea lines for grain yield (GY), hundred seed weight (HSDWT) and days to 50% flowering (DT50FL). A total of 614 F6 genotypes constituting the sets, grouped by maturity, were evaluated across two locations in Northern Nigeria, in an alpha lattice design, two replications each. Data were recorded on GY, HSDWT and DT50FL.Variance components, genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), and genetic advance (GA) were used to decode the magnitude of genetic variance within and among sets. Genetic usefulness (Up) which depends on mean and variance to score the genetic merits in historically bi-parental populations was applied to groups of breeding lines with mixed parentage. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to depict contribution of traits to observed variations. GY and DT50FL explained the variance within and between sets respectively. Genotypes were significantly different, although genotype-by-location and set-by-location interaction effects were also prominent. Genetic variance (δ2G) and GCV were high for GY in Prelim2 (δ2G = 45,897; GCV = 19.58%), HSDWT in Prelim11 (δ2G = 7.137; GCV = 17.07%) and DT50F in Prelim5 (δ2G = 4.54; GCV = 4.4%). Heritability varied among sets for GY (H = 0.21 to 0.57), HSDWT (H = 0.76 to 0.93) and DT50FL (H = 0.20 to 0.81). GA and percentage GA (GAPM) were high for GY in Prelim2 (GAPM = 24.59%; GA = 269.05Kg/ha), HSDWT in Prelim11 (GAPM = 28.54%; GA = 4.47 g), and DT50F in Prelim10 (GAPM = 6.49%; GA = 3.01 days). These sets also registered high values of genetic usefulness, suggesting potential application in non-full sib populations. These approaches can be used during preliminary performance tests to reinforce decisions in extracting promising lines and choose among defined groups of lines.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Horticulture,Plant Science,Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Adewale BD, Okonji C, Oyekanmi AA et al (2010) Genotypic variability and stability of some grain yield components of Cowpea. African J Agric Res 5:874–880
2. Agbicodo EM, Fatokun CA, Muranaka S et al (2009) Breeding drought tolerant cowpea: Constraints, accomplishments, and future prospects. Euphytica 16:353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9893-8
3. Ahenkora K, Adu Dapaah HK, Agyemang A (1998) Selected nutritional components and sensory attributes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp) leaves. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 52:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008019113245
4. Ahmad MM, Ibrahim HA, Abdul I et al (2010) Comparative studies on the yield potentials of cowpea Varieties grown under sole spray and sole no spray Conditions. Biol Environ Sci J Trop 7:141–145
5. Ajeigbe HA, Saidou AK, Singh BB et al (2012) Potentials for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) for dry season grain and fodder production in the Sudan and Sahel zones of West Africa. In: Boukar O, Coulibaly O, Fatokun CA et al (eds) Innovative Research Along the Cowpea Value Chain. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献