Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of patient-specific rods for adult spinal deformity.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature was performed through an electronic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Human studies between 2012 and 2023 were included. Sample size, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), operation time, blood loss, follow-up duration, and complications were recorded for each study when available.
Results
Seven studies with a total of 304 adult spinal deformity patients of various etiologies were included. All studies reported SVA, and PT; two studies did not report PI-LL. Four studies reported planned radiographic outcomes. Two found a significant association between preoperative plan and postoperative outcome in all three outcomes. One found a significant association for PI-LL alone. The fourth found no significant associations. SVA improved in six of seven studies, PI-LL improved in all five, and three of seven studies found improved postoperative PT. Significance of these results varied greatly by study.
Conclusion
Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits of PSRs in achieving optimal spino-pelvic parameters in ASD surgery. Nevertheless, conclusions regarding the superiority of PSRs over traditional rods must be judiciously drawn, given the heterogeneity of patients and study methodologies, potential confounding variables, and the absence of robust randomized controlled trials. Future investigations should concentrate on enhancing preoperative planning, standardizing surgical methodologies, isolating specific patient subgroups, and head-to-head comparisons with traditional rods to fully elucidate the impact of PSRs in ASD surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG et al (2020) Adult spinal deformity: current concepts and decision-making strategies for management. Asian Spine J 14(6):886–897. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0568
2. Patel AV, White CA, Schwartz JT et al (2021) Emerging technologies in the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Neurospine 18(3):417–427. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142412.206
3. Cerpa M, Lenke LG, Fehlings MG, Shaffrey CI, Cheung KMC, Carreon LY (2019) Evolution and advancement of adult spinal deformity research and clinical care: an overview of the Scoli-RISK-1 study. Glob Spine J 9(1 Suppl):8S-14S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219828729
4. Adult spinal deformities: can patient-specific rods change the preoperative planning into clinical reality? Feasibility study and preliminary results about 77 cases—PMC. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368934/
5. Pivazyan G, Cobourn KD, Voyadzis JM, Sandhu FA (2022) Use of computer navigation and robotics in adult spinal deformity. Semin Spine Surg 34(4):100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semss.2022.100988
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献