Abstract
AbstractA retiree’s appetite for risk is a common input into the lifetime utility models that are traditionally used to find optimal strategies for the decumulation of retirement savings. In this work, we consider a retiree with potentially differing appetites for the key financial risks of decumulation: liquidity risk and investment risk. We set out to determine whether these differing risk appetites have a significant impact on the retiree’s optimal choice of decumulation strategy. To do so, we design and implement a framework which selects the optimal decumulation strategy from a general set of admissible strategies in line with a retiree’s goals, and under differing appetites for the key risks of decumulation. Overall, we find significant evidence to suggest that a retiree’s differing appetites for different decumulation risks will impact their optimal choice of strategy at retirement. Through an illustrative example calibrated to the Australian context, we find results which are consistent with actual behaviours in this jurisdiction (in particular, a shallow market for annuities), which lends support to our framework and may provide some new insight into the so-called annuity puzzle.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. ABS: Life Tables (2022). https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/life-tables/latest-release
2. AIHW: Income Support for Older Australians (2023). https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-welfare/income-support-older-australians
3. Albrecht, P., Maurer, R.: Self-annuitization, consumption shortfall in retirement and asset allocation: the annuity benchmark. J. Pension Econ. Finance 1, 269–288 (2002)
4. ASFA: Retirement Standard (2023). https://www.superannuation.asn.au/resources/retirement-standard
5. Bär, M., Gatzert, N.: Products and strategies for the decumulation of wealth during retirement: insights from the literature. N. Am. Actuar. J. 27, 322–340 (2022)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Can an actuarially unfair tontine be optimal?;The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review;2024-07-07