Modeling for Understanding v. Modeling for Numbers-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Modeling for Understanding v. Modeling for Numbers

Published:2016-11-10 Issue:2 Volume:20 Page:215-221
ISSN:1432-9840
Container-title:Ecosystems
language:en
Short-container-title:Ecosystems

Author:

Rastetter Edward B.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10021-016-0067-y.pdf

Reference41 articles.

1. Ågren G, Bosatta E. 1990. Theory and model or art and technology in ecology. Ecol Model 50:213–20.

2. Ågren G, Bosatta E. 1996. Theoretical ecosystems ecology; understanding element cycles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Ayala FJ, Gilpin ME, Ehrenfeld JG. 1973. Competition between species: theoretical models and experimental tests. Theor Popul Biol 4:331–56.

4. Bedau MA. 2013. Weak emergence drives the science, epistemology, and metaphysics of synthetic biology. Biol Theory 8(4):334–45.

5. Box GEP. 1979. Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: Launer RL, Wilkinson GN, Eds. Robustness in statistics. New York: Academic Press. p 201–36.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Has nitrogen availability decreased over much of the land surface in the past century? A model-based analysis;Biogeochemistry;2024-05-03

2. Defining model complexity: An ecological perspective;Meteorological Applications;2024-05

3. Feeding the fever: Complex host‐pathogen dynamics along continuous resource gradients;Ecology and Evolution;2023-07

4. Models of underlying autotrophic biomass dynamics fit to daily river ecosystem productivity estimates improve understanding of ecosystem disturbance and resilience;Ecology Letters;2023-06-23

5. Models of underlying autotrophic biomass dynamics fit to daily river ecosystem productivity estimates improve understanding of ecosystem disturbance and resilience;2023-04-13