Abstract
AbstractPeatlands represent an important component of the global carbon cycle, storing 180–621 Gt of carbon (C). Small-scale spatial variations in elevation, frequently referred to as microtopography, influence ecological processes associated with the peatland C cycle, including Sphagnum photosynthesis and methane flux. Microtopography can be characterized with measures of topographic variability and by using conceptual classes (microforms) linked to function: most commonly hummocks and hollows. However, the criteria used to define these conceptual classes are often poorly described, if at all, and vary between studies. Such inconsistencies compel development of explicit quantitative methods to classify microforms. Furthermore, gradient-based characterizations that describe spatial variability without the use of microforms are lacking in the literature. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) calculate peatland microtopographical elevation gradients and measures of spatial variability, (2) develop three microform classification methods intended for specific purposes, and (3) evaluate and contrast classification methods. Our results suggest that at spatial scales much larger than microforms, elevation distributions are unimodal and are well approximated with parametric probability density functions. Results from classifications were variable between methods and years and exhibited significant differences in mean hollow areal coverages of a raised ombrotrophic bog. Our results suggest that the conceptualization and classification of microforms can significantly influence microtopographic structural metrics. The three explicit methods for microform classification described here may be used and built upon for future applications.
Funder
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Boise State University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference88 articles.
1. Allmaras RR, Burwell RE, Larson WE, Holt FE. 1966. Total porosity and random roughness of the interrow zone as influenced by tillage. Conservation Research Report 7. Washington, DC, USDA.
2. Almendinger JC, Almendinger JE, Glaser PH. 1986. Topographic fluctuations across a spring fen and raised bog in the Lost River peatland, Northern Minnesota. Journal of Ecology 74:393–401.
3. Andrus R, Wagner DJ, Titus JE. 1983. Vertical distribution of Sphagnum mosses along hummock–hollow gradients. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:3128–39.
4. Arsenault J, Talbot J, Moore TR, Beauvais MP, Franssen J, Roulet NT. 2019. The spatial heterogeneity of vegetation, hydrology and water chemistry in a peatland with open-water pool. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00342-4.
5. Baird AJ, Morris PJ, Belyea LR. 2011. The DigiBog peatland development model 1: rationale, conceptual model, and hydrological basis. Ecohydrology 5:242–55.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献