Abstract
AbstractIn realist international relations theory, world order is assumed to be a vertical structure ordered by relative power, with the hegemon, or the contest of hegemons, at its apex. Power is viewed as the ability to coerce, and security lies in the avoidance of defeat. But the proportional changes in the globalized economy of this century have created a new reality, one in which effective pursuit of one’s own national interest is more complex than compelling or submitting. Differences in relative power and capabilities still matter, and differences in situations create conflicts of interests. But the horizontal dimension of continuing interaction among autonomous actors is more important than the vertical dimension of unilateral imposition. Without hegemony, states have agency, but they face greater uncertainty. The diplomatic calculus of each state is to pursue its national interests, but a major component of this pursuit lies in reducing uncertainty. Strategy for a post-hegemonic multinodal world stresses the complex ecology of action, the importance of relationships, the utility of partnerships, the encouragement of common interests, and the problems of conducting limited conflicts. These are principles of strategic prudence relevant to the global matrix of asymmetric international relationships.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The end of American world order. New York: Polity.
2. Allison, Graham. 2016. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4. Buzan, Barry. 2011. A world order without superpowers: Decentered globalism. International Relations 25 (3): 3–25.
5. Bremmer, Ian. 2013. Every nation for itself: Winners and losers in a G-zero world. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献