Author:
Houssein Essam H.,Saad Mohammed R.,Çelik Emre,Hu Gang,Ali Abdelmgeid A.,Shaban Hassan
Abstract
AbstractAn efficient variant of the recent sea horse optimizer (SHO) called SHO-OBL is presented, which incorporates the opposition-based learning (OBL) approach into the predation behavior of SHO and uses the greedy selection (GS) technique at the end of each optimization cycle. This enhancement was created to avoid being trapped by local optima and to improve the quality and variety of solutions obtained. However, the SHO can occasionally be vulnerable to stagnation in local optima, which is a problem of concern given the low diversity of sea horses. In this paper, an SHO-OBL is suggested for the tackling of genuine and global optimization systems. To investigate the validity of the suggested SHO-OBL, it is compared with nine robust optimizers, including differential evolution (DE), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), moth-flame optimization algorithm (MFO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), fitness dependent optimizer (FDO), Harris hawks optimization (HHO), chimp optimization algorithm (ChOA), Fox optimizer (FOX), and the basic SHO in ten unconstrained test routines belonging to the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation 2020 (CEC’20). Furthermore, three different design engineering issues, including the welded beam, the tension/compression spring, and the pressure vessel, are solved using the proposed SHO-OBL to test its applicability. In addition, one of the most successful approaches to data transmission in a wireless sensor network that uses little energy is clustering. In this paper, SHO-OBL is suggested to assist in the process of choosing the optimal power-aware cluster heads based on a predefined objective function that takes into account the residual power of the node, as well as the sum of the powers of surrounding nodes. Similarly, the performance of SHO-OBL is compared to that of its competitors. Thorough simulations demonstrate that the suggested SHO-OBL algorithm outperforms in terms of residual power, network lifespan, and extended stability duration.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Saha, C., Das, S., Pal, K., Mukherjee, S.: A fuzzy rule-based penalty function approach for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46(12), 2953–2965 (2014)
2. Houssein, E.H., Sayed, A.: Dynamic candidate solution boosted beluga whale optimization algorithm for biomedical classification. Mathematics 11(3), 707 (2023)
3. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95—international conference on neural networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948. IEEE (1995)
4. Dorigo, M., Di Caro, G.: Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic. In: Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406), vol. 2, pp. 1470–1477. IEEE (1999)
5. Karaboga, D., et al.: An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report, Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer (2005)