Electric and biomethane-fuelled urban buses: comparison of environmental performance of different powertrains

Author:

Mastinu GiampieroORCID,Solari Laura

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The paper aims to promote the transition to low/zero emission of the local public transport, particularly, urban buses are taken into account. Method The life cycle assessment of electric and biomethane-fuelled urban buses is performed by exploiting SimaPro commercial software (v.9.1.1.). Attention is focused on powertrains. Both midpoint and endpoint analyses are performed. Referring to environmental impact, the best compressed biomethane gas (CBG) powertrain was compared to the best electric one. Additionally, the worst-case scenario has been considered for both CBG and electric powertrains. Results CBG powertrain outperforms the electric one if overall greenhouse gas emissions are considered. However, the electric powertrain seems promising for human health and ecosystem. Conclusions The environmental performance of the two powertrains is good. Both of the two technologies have strength and weak points that anyhow make them good candidates for a clean local public transport of the future. The analysis performed in the paper suggests a future investigation on hybrid electric-CBG powertrain. Actually, such a solution could benefit from both the strengths of the biomethane and the electric powertrain.

Funder

MUR

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Environmental Science

Reference65 articles.

1. Agostini A (2006) JRC — avoided methane emissions from manure digestion. European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, Cleaner Energy Unit

2. Argonne National Laboratory (2012) Material and energy flows in the materials production, assembly, and end-of.life stages of the automotive Lithium-Ion battery life cycle., U.S. Department of Energy

3. Auer J, Meinke A (2018) Comparative life cycle assessment of electric motors with different efficiency classes: a deep dive into the trade-offs between the life cycle stages in ecodesign contex. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1590–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1378-8

4. Beltran A, Cox B, Mutel C, van Vuuren DP, Vivanco DF, Deetman S, Edelenbosch OY, Jeroen Guine J, Tukker A (2020) When the background matters using scenarios from integrated assessment models in prospective life cycle assessment. J of Cleaner Prod 259:120904. ISSN 0959–6526

5. Bouter A, Hache E, Ternel C, Beauchet S (2020) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of several powertrain types for cars and buses in France for two driving cycles: “worldwide harmonized light vehicle test procedure” cycle and urban cycle. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(8):1545–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01756-2

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3