Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The paper aims to promote the transition to low/zero emission of the local public transport, particularly, urban buses are taken into account.
Method
The life cycle assessment of electric and biomethane-fuelled urban buses is performed by exploiting SimaPro commercial software (v.9.1.1.). Attention is focused on powertrains. Both midpoint and endpoint analyses are performed. Referring to environmental impact, the best compressed biomethane gas (CBG) powertrain was compared to the best electric one. Additionally, the worst-case scenario has been considered for both CBG and electric powertrains.
Results
CBG powertrain outperforms the electric one if overall greenhouse gas emissions are considered. However, the electric powertrain seems promising for human health and ecosystem.
Conclusions
The environmental performance of the two powertrains is good. Both of the two technologies have strength and weak points that anyhow make them good candidates for a clean local public transport of the future. The analysis performed in the paper suggests a future investigation on hybrid electric-CBG powertrain. Actually, such a solution could benefit from both the strengths of the biomethane and the electric powertrain.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Agostini A (2006) JRC — avoided methane emissions from manure digestion. European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, Cleaner Energy Unit
2. Argonne National Laboratory (2012) Material and energy flows in the materials production, assembly, and end-of.life stages of the automotive Lithium-Ion battery life cycle., U.S. Department of Energy
3. Auer J, Meinke A (2018) Comparative life cycle assessment of electric motors with different efficiency classes: a deep dive into the trade-offs between the life cycle stages in ecodesign contex. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1590–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1378-8
4. Beltran A, Cox B, Mutel C, van Vuuren DP, Vivanco DF, Deetman S, Edelenbosch OY, Jeroen Guine J, Tukker A (2020) When the background matters using scenarios from integrated assessment models in prospective life cycle assessment. J of Cleaner Prod 259:120904. ISSN 0959–6526
5. Bouter A, Hache E, Ternel C, Beauchet S (2020) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of several powertrain types for cars and buses in France for two driving cycles: “worldwide harmonized light vehicle test procedure” cycle and urban cycle. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(8):1545–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01756-2
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献