Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has established itself as part of the sustainability toolkit of the private sector, informing environmental decision-making and improving environmental performance. However, we know less about its use in the public sector. To what extent and how do governments refer to LCA in their public policies? We review the literature on the use of LCA in public policy and gauge how LCA has penetrated public policymaking through its incorporation in different policy instruments across various sectors. We then discuss the politics of LCA use in policymaking.
Methods
We review the literature on LCA from a public policy and social science perspective (1) and back our argument with information from a dozen interviews with LCA experts from government, consultancy, and academia in France, Germany, Switzerland, and the EU (2).
Results
We show that, along with the growing importance of target setting and science-based environmental and climate policymaking, LCA has penetrated the realm of public policy in OECD countries in different policy sectors. Our understanding of the politics of LCA use in policymaking is however deficient, which leads us to outline a research agenda.
Conclusions
With the growing importance of LCA in public policy, societal values, public/private governance, state capacity, and political agency should be addressed in further research.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Acciai C, Capano G (2021) Policy instruments at work: a meta-analysis of their applications. Publ Adm 99(1):118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12673
2. Allen DT, Consoli F, Davis G, Fava JA, Warren J (1997) Public policy applications of life-cycle assessment: proceedings from the Workshop on Application of Life-Cycle Assessment to Public Policy, 14–19 August 1995. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Wintergreen, Virginia
3. Bjørn A, Owsianiak M, Molin C, Hauschild MZ (2018) LCA History. In: Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (eds) Life Cycle Assessment. Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham, pp. 17–30
4. Bjørn A, Lloyd S, Matthews D (2021) From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting ‘science-based’ emission targets. Environ Res Lett 16:054019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe57b
5. Bras-Klapwijk RM (1998) Are life cycle assessments a threat to sound public policy making? Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(6):333–342.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979344
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献