Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Biodegradable mulch film is considered an environmentally friendly alternative to non-biodegradable-based mulch film for agricultural use. The purpose of this study is to compare the environmental impact of non-biodegradable mulch film to biodegradable mulch films for use in Nordic conditions, including assessing their plastic pollution potential.
Methods
A life cycle assessment was conducted to calculate the potential environmental impacts of the films, while the plastic pollution potential was assessed with a dynamic material flow analysis, considering degradation over time and fate to various environmental compartments. The plastic pollution potential was based on empirical degradation data in Nordic conditions.
Results and discussion
The results of the LCA and MFA analyses show that the use of non-biodegradable material in Nordic conditions leads to the lowest environmental impacts and pollution if it is fully collected after use. In fact, biodegradable mulch film leads to higher environmental impacts over its life cycle in most environmental impact categories. However, comparing environmental burdens from non-biodegradable and biodegradable mulch film is difficult due to the lack of data on biodegradable films. The results further highlight that biodegradable films will reach a dynamic equilibrium (a plateau phase) in soils in Nordic conditions between the degradation of old film and the application of new film, if not enough time is given for the films to entirely degrade. Farmers would need to apply biodegradable films with several years of interval, if the films should be entirely degraded.
Conclusions
This study supports the recommendations that biodegradable plastic has potential when used as mulch film, but these recommendations should be situation-specific, depending on farmers’ ability to handle the mulch film properly. The authors highlight that the LCA results are uncertain due to limited data availability and encourage the biodegradable plastic industry to be more transparent by making their LCIA data available.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference71 articles.
1. Akhir MAM, Mustapha M (2022) Formulation of biodegradable plastic mulch film for agriculture crop protection: a review. Polym Rev 62:890–918
2. Askham C, Pauna VH, Boulay A-M, Fantke P, Jolliet O, Lavoie J, Booth AM, Coutris C, Verones F, Weber M, Vijver MG, Lusher A, Hajjar C (2023) Generating environmental sampling and testing data for micro- and nanoplastics for use in life cycle impact assessment. Sci Total Environ 859:160038
3. Bastioli C (2001) Global status of the production of biobased packaging materials. Starch - Stärke 53
4. Bauchmüller V, Carus M, Chinthapalli R, Dammer L, Hark N, Partanen A, Ruiz P, Lajewski S (2021) BioSinn: products for which biodegradation makes sense. Hürth: nova-Institut für politische und ökologische Innovation GmbH
5. Borchani EK, Carrot C, Jaziri M (2015) Biocomposites of Alfa fibers dispersed in the Mater-Bi® type bioplastic: morphology, mechanical and thermal properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 78:371–379
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献