Abstract
Abstract
Archaeologists have explored a wide range of topics regarding archaeological stone tools and their connection to past human lifeways through experimentation. Controlled experimentation systematically quantifies the empirical relationships among different flaking variables under a controlled and reproducible setting. This approach offers a platform to generate and test hypotheses about the technological decisions of past knappers from the perspective of basic flaking mechanics. Over the past decade, Harold Dibble and colleagues conducted a set of controlled flaking experiments to better understand flake variability using mechanical flaking apparatuses and standardized cores. Results of their studies underscore the dominant impact of exterior platform angle and platform depth on flake size and shape and have led to the synthesis of a flake formation model, namely the EPA-PD model. However, the results also illustrate the complexity of the flake formation process through the influence of other parameters such as core surface morphology and force application. Here we review the work of Dibble and colleagues on controlled flaking experiments by summarizing their findings to date. Our goal is to synthesize what was learned about flake variability from these controlled experiments to better understand the flake formation process. With this paper, we are including all of the data produced by these prior experiments and an explanation of the data in the Supplementary Information.
Funder
National Science Foundation
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology
University of Pennsylvania School and Arts and Sciences
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference138 articles.
1. Andrefsky, W. (1994). Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity, 59(1), 21–34.
2. Andrefsky, W. (2006). Experimental and archaeological verification of an index of retouch for hafted bifaces. American Antiquity, 71(4), 743–757.
3. Archer, W., Pop, C. M., Rezek, Z., Schlager, S., Lin, S. C., Weiss, M., Dogandžić, T., Desta, D., & McPherron, S. P. (2018). A geometric morphometric relationship predicts stone flake shape and size variability. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(8), 1991–2003.
4. Boëda, E. (1982). Etude expérimentale de la technologie des pointes Levallois in Tailler! Pourquoi faire: Préhistoire et technologie lithique II, Recent Progress in Microwear Studies. Studia Praehistorica Belgica Leuven, 2, 23–56.
5. Boëda, E. (1993). Le débitage discoïde et le débitage Levallois récurrent centripède. Bulletin De La Société Préhistorique Française, 90(6), 392–404.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献