Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Ecological Changes, Social Behaviour and Human Intergroup Tolerance 300,000 to 30,000 BP
-
Published:2021-02-03
Issue:1
Volume:28
Page:53-75
-
ISSN:1072-5369
-
Container-title:Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Archaeol Method Theory
Author:
Spikins PennyORCID, French Jennifer C., John-Wood Seren, Dytham Calvin
Abstract
AbstractArchaeological evidence suggests that important shifts were taking place in the character of human social behaviours 300,000 to 30,000 years ago. New artefact types appear and are disseminated with greater frequency. Transfers of both raw materials and finished artefacts take place over increasing distances, implying larger scales of regional mobility and more frequent and friendlier interactions between different communities. Whilst these changes occur during a period of increasing environmental variability, the relationship between ecological changes and transformations in social behaviours is elusive. Here, we explore a possible theoretical approach and methodology for understanding how ecological contexts can influence selection pressures acting on intergroup social behaviours. We focus on the relative advantages and disadvantages of intergroup tolerance in different ecological contexts using agent-based modelling (ABM). We assess the relative costs and benefits of different ‘tolerance’ levels in between-group interactions on survival and resource exploitation in different environments. The results enable us to infer a potential relationship between ecological changes and proposed changes in between-group behavioural dynamics. We conclude that increasingly harsh environments may have driven changes in hormonal and emotional responses in humans leading to increasing intergroup tolerance, i.e. transformations in social behaviour associated with ‘self-domestication’. We argue that changes in intergroup tolerance is a more parsimonious explanation for the emergence of what has been seen as ‘modern human behaviour’ than changes in hard aspects of cognition or other factors such as cognitive adaptability or population size.
Funder
Wenner-Gren Foundation John Templeton Foundation York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archaeology,Archaeology
Reference106 articles.
1. Agam, A., & Barkai, R. (2016). Not the brain alone: the nutritional potential of elephant heads in Paleolithic sites. Quaternary International, 406(B), 218–226. 2. Ames, C. J. H., Riel-Salvatore, J., & Collins, B. R. (2013). Why we need an alternative approach to the study of modern human behaviour. Canadian Journal of Archaeology / Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 37(1), 21–47. 3. Bird, D. W., Bird, R. B., Codding, B. F., & Zeanah, D. W. (2019). Variability in the organization and size of hunter-gatherer groups: foragers do not live in small-scale societies. Journal of Human Evolution, 131, 96–108. 4. Brantingham, P. J. (2003). A neutral model of stone raw material procurement. American Antiquity, 68(3), 487–509. 5. Brooks, A. S., Yellen, J. E., Potts, R., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Deino, A. L., Leslie, D. E., Ambrose, S. H., Ferguson, J. R., d’Errico, F., Zipkin, A. M., Whittaker, S., Post, J., Veatch, E. G., Foecke, K., & Clark, J. B. (2018). Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest middle stone age. Science, 360(6384), 90–94.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|