Abstract
AbstractGround stone tool (GST) technology includes artefacts utilized in pounding or grinding activities and characterized by long life cycles and multiple uses. The introduction of such technology dates back to early prehistory, and for this reason, it is used as prime evidence for tackling a wide range of archaeological questions such as the origins of technology, patterns of daily subsistence and lifeways. In this paper, we contribute to the field of study of GSTs by discussing the application of a novel multi-level analytical approach combining use wear and residue observations at low and high magnification with residue spatial distribution investigated using GIS. We aim to assess the potential of a combined use wear and residue approach to (1) discriminate specific gestures and worked materials on sandstone GSTs and (2) understand the potential of residue distributions for reconstructing ancient GST functions and, more specifically, the role of GSTs recovered at Mesolithic sites of the Danube Gorges region in the Central Balkans. We identified diagnostic surface modifications associated with the use of GSTs in different activities involving both animal and plant materials. Morphological characteristics of residues have been described under reflected and transmitted light and characterized using biochemical staining. Finally, we mapped residues across the utilized surfaces of experimental tools to link patterns of residue spatial distribution to specific materials and gestures. We expect our methodological approach will be taken up by other researchers in order to produce comparable datasets on GSTs and improve our understanding of their ancient functional biographies.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. Adams, J. L. (1999). Refocusing the role of food-grinding tools as correlates for subsistence strategies in the U.S. southwest. American Antiquity, 64(3), 475–498.
2. Adams, J. L. (2014). Ground stone use-wear analysis: a review of terminology and experimental methods. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48, 129–138.
3. Adams, J. L., Delgado, S., Dubreuil, L., Hamon, C., Plisson, H., & Risch, R. (2006). Functional analysis of macro-lithic artefacts: a focus on working surfaces. In I. F. Sternke, L. Eigeland, & L.-J. Costa (Eds.), Presented at the Non-Flint Raw Material Use in Prehistory. Archaeopress.
4. Antonović, D., Perić, S., & Resimić-Šarić, K. (2006). Stone Tools from Lepenski Vir. Institute of Archaeology.
5. Aranguren, B., Becattini, R., Lippi, M. M., & Revedin, A. (2007). Grinding flour in Upper Palaeolithic Europe (25 000 years bp). ANTIQUITY-OXFORD, 81(314), 845–855.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献