Abstract
AbstractWe develop a framework to differentiate the technological niches of co-existing hominin species by reviewing some theoretical biases influential in thinking about techno-behaviours of extinct hominins, such as a teleological bias in discussing technological evolution. We suggest that some stone-tool classification systems underestimate technological variability, while overestimating the complexity of the behaviours most commonly represented. To model the likely technological niches of extinct populations, we combine ecological principles (i.e.competitive exclusion) with physical anthropology and the archaeological record. We test the framework by applying it to the co-existence ofHomo nalediandHomo sapiensduring the late Middle Pleistocene in southern Africa. Based on our analysis, we suggest that tool use was probably not an essential part ofH. naledi’s niche, but that technology occasionally provided caloric benefits. In contrast, tool use was a structural part of theH. sapiensway of life. We provide reasoning for our interpretation that the latter population is associated with more sophisticated reduction strategies and the development of prepared core technology. The method also has applicability to cases such as the co-existence of different toolmakers during the Earlier Stone Age (ESA) in East Africa and the co-existence of Neanderthals andH. sapiensin Eurasia.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献