Abstract
AbstractLandscape plays a vital role in the development of military campaigns through the definition of geostrategic landmarks that structure the control of the territory, the imposition of constraints to the movement of armies and the identification of features that facilitate defence against attackers. These factors are linked to the study of past spatial mobility which is typically done by finding optimal pathways between pairs of points using Least-Cost Path analysis. This emphasis on optimality may not be ideal for case studies that need a general approach to spatial connectivity such as the study of conflict-related dynamics. Connectivity modelling based on Circuit Theory (CT) is an alternative approach to spatial mobility that captures the connectivity of an entire region identifying not only optimal paths but also bottlenecks, dead-ends and any other spatial feature that may impact movement. We present here a framework to study landscapes of conflict using connectivity modelling; the framework combines CT, visibility analysis and statistical hypothesis testing to understand the reasons behind the assault and destruction of Puig Ciutat (NE Iberian Peninsula) during Julius Caesar’s civil war. Results suggest that the site exerted decisive control over a highly connected area linking two possible logistical bases (Emporion and Massalia) to the armies fighting at Ilerda (49 BC).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Anantharaman, R., Hall, K., Shah, V. B., & Edelman, A. (2020). Circuitscape in Julia: High performance connectivity modelling to support conservation decisions. Proceedings of the JuliaCon Conferences, 1(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.21105/jcon.00058
2. Bell, T., Wilson, A., & Wickham, A. (2002). Tracking the Samnites: Landscape and communications routes in the Sangro Valley, Italy. American Journal of Archaeology, 106(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126242
3. Bellón, J. P., Rueda, C., Lechuga, M. Á., & Moreno, M. I. (2016). An archaeological analysis of a battlefield of the Second Punic War: The camps of the battle of Baecula. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 29, 73–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400072056
4. Ble Gimeno, E. (2016). Guerra y conflicto en el nordeste de Hispania durante el período romano republicano (218—45 a.C). La presencia del ejército romano a partir de sus evidencias arqueológicas metálicas [PhD Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona]. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/398391. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
5. Bleed, P., & Scott, D. D. (2011). Contexts for conflict: Conceptual tools for interpreting archaeological reflections of warfare. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 6(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1179/157407811X12958860458497
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献