Hospital volume allocation: integrating decision maker and patient perspectives

Author:

Listorti Elisabetta,Alfieri Arianna,Pastore EricaORCID

Abstract

AbstractPlanning problems in healthcare systems have received greater attention in the last decade, especially because of the concerns recently raised about the scattering of surgical interventions among a wide number of different facilities that can undermine the quality of the outcome due to the volume-outcome association. In this paper, an approach to plan the amount of surgical interventions that a facility has to perform to assure a low adjusted mortality rate is proposed. The approach explicitly takes into account the existing interaction among patients’ choices and decision makers’ planning decisions. The first objective of the proposed approach is to find a solution able to reach quality in health outcomes and patients’ adherence. The second objective is to investigate the difference among solutions that are identified as optimal by either only one of the actors’ perspective, i.e., decision makers and patients, or by considering both the perspectives simultaneously. Following these objectives, the proposed approach is applied to a case study on Italian colon cancer interventions performed in 2014. Results confirm a variation in the hospital planned volumes when considering patients’ behaviour together with the policy maker plan, especially due to personal preferences and lack of information about hospital quality.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Health Professions,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference37 articles.

1. Agenas (National Agency for regional health services). National Outcome Program (2016). Available at http://95.110.213.190/PNEed16

2. Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J (2017) Patient mobility for elective secondary health care services in response to patient choice policies: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 74(4):379–403

3. Ahmadi-Javid A, Seyedi P, Syam SS (2017) A survey of healthcare facility location. Comput Oper Res 79:223–263

4. AIOM A (2016) I numeri del cancro in Italia Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore

5. Alfieri A, Listorti E, Matta A (2016) Improving surgical outcomes through optimal volumes allocation. Flexible Serv Manuf J 30(1–2):272–295

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3