Lawyers’ economics versus economic analysis of law: a critique of professor Posner’s “economic” approach to law by reference to a case concerning damages for loss of earning capacity-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Lawyers’ economics versus economic analysis of law: a critique of professor Posner’s “economic” approach to law by reference to a case concerning damages for loss of earning capacity

Published:2017-04-10 Issue:3 Volume:43 Page:517-534
ISSN:0929-1261
Container-title:European Journal of Law and Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Law Econ

Author:

Backhaus Juergen G.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10657-017-9559-2.pdf

Reference10 articles.

1. Ackermann, B. A. (1977). Private property and the constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

2. Buchanan, J. M. (1974). Good economics—Bad law. Virginia Law Review, 60, 483–492.

3. Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

5. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Methodological Individualism and the Foundations of the “Law and Economics” Movement;The Palgrave Handbook of Methodological Individualism;2023

2. Richard A. Posner (1939–);The Palgrave Companion to Chicago Economics;2022

3. Richard A. Posner (1939–);SSRN Electronic Journal;2022

4. The state of exception at the legal boundaries: Re-evaluation of a critical concept;Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine;2020

5. Law, economics and Calabresi on the future of law and economics;European Journal of Law and Economics;2019-06-10