Economic impossibility in Turkish contract law from the perspective of law and economics-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Economic impossibility in Turkish contract law from the perspective of law and economics

Published:2010-07-09 Issue:1 Volume:34 Page:105-126
ISSN:0929-1261
Container-title:European Journal of Law and Economics
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Law Econ

Author:

Aksoy Hüseyin Can,Schäfer Hans-Bernd

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10657-010-9170-2.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Akyol, Ş. (2006). Dürüstlük Kuralı ve Hakkın Kötüye Kullanılması Yasağı (2nd ed.). İstanbul: Vedat.

2. Barnett, R. E. (2005). Perspectives on contract law (3rd ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.

3. Birmingham, R. L. (1968–1969). A second look at the Suez Canal cases: Excuse for nonperformance of contractual obligations in the light of economic theory. Hastings Law Review, 20, 1393–1416.

4. Bruce, C. J. (1982). An economic analysis of the impossibility doctrine. Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 311–322.

5. Calabresi, G. (1970). The costs of accidents: A legal and economic analysis (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Web of Science Penceresinden Türkiye Adresli Hukuk Yayınlarına Genel Bakış;Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi;2021-08-20

2. Impracticability;Encyclopedia of Law and Economics;2021

3. Impracticability;Encyclopedia of Law and Economics;2019

4. IMPOSSIBILITY OF PERFORMANCE OF AN OBLIGATION IN TURKISH AND SWISS CIVIL LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN CIVIL CODE REFORM: FEATURES OF RECEPTION AND DEVELOPMENT (PART II);Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo;2016-06-01

5. Impracticability;Encyclopedia of Law and Economics;2014