Abstract
AbstractPrevious research has not explained the use of real option clause in franchise contracting. The real option clause has two economic functions: To reduce transaction costs by mitigating opportunism risk and to increase strategic rents by exploiting the profit potential from future upside opportunities under uncertainty. We argue that franchisors will more likely use a real option clause (ROC) in franchise contracts under high behavioral uncertainty, high franchisors’ transaction-specific investments relative to franchisees’ and long contract duration. In addition, by combining transaction cost theory and real option theory, our study provides a new explanation for the impact of environmental uncertainty on the use of ROC in franchise networks by showing that there exists a U-shaped relationship between environmental uncertainty and the franchisor’s use of ROC. Overall, the data from German and Swiss franchise systems provide support of the research model.
Funder
Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference84 articles.
1. Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. (2004a). What is not a real option: considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review, 29, 74–85.
2. Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. (2004b). Real options and real tradeoffs. Academy of Management Review, 29, 120–126.
3. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
4. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.
5. Barthélemy, J. (2008). Opportunism, knowledge, and the performance of franchise chains. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1451–1463.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献