Abstract
AbstractNetwork neutrality regulations are intended to preserve the Internet as a non-discriminatory, public network and an open platform for innovation. Whereas the U.S. reversed its regulations in 2017, returning to a less strict regime, the EU has maintained its course and recently revised implementation guidelines for its strict and rather interventionist net neutrality regulations. To this day, there exist only a few empirical investigations on the impact of network neutrality regulations, based on rather broad measures of investment activities for individual countries. Our paper provides the first estimation results on the causal impact of net neutrality regulations on new high-speed (fiber-optic cable-based) infrastructure investment by Internet service providers. We use a comprehensive and most recent OECD panel data set for 32 countries for the period from 2000 to 2021 covering the entire high-speed broadband network deployment period. We employ various panel estimation techniques, including instrumental variables estimation. Our empirical analysis is based on theoretical underpinnings derived from a simplified model in a two-sided market framework. We find empirical evidence that net neutrality regulations exert a significant and strong negative impact on fiber investments. Our results suggest that, while we cannot provide evidence on the overall welfare consequences of net neutrality, imposing strict net neutrality regulations clearly slow down the deployment of new fiber-based broadband connections.
Funder
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The skill complementarity of broadband internet. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 30, 1781–1824.
2. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.
3. BEREC (2016). BEREC guidelines on the implementation by national regulators of European net neutrality rules, BoR (16) 127. https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/6160-berec-guidelines-on-the-implementation-by-national-regulators-of-european-net-neutrality-rules
4. BEREC (2020). BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation of the Open Internet Regulation, BoR (20) 112. https://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/regulatory_best_practices/guidelines/9277-berec-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-open-internet-regulation
5. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. CeMMAP working papers from Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, No CWP09/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献