Author:
Lause Michael,Hansen Emma,Libson Karissa,Pettit Cory,Himed Sonia,Rismiller Kyle P.,Huff Sara,Korman Abraham M.,Blaszczak Alecia M.,Hsueh Willa,Milani-Nejad Nima,Kofmehl Leah,Hebert Courtney,Caterino Jeffrey M.,Wang Henry E.,Yildiz Vedat,Trinidad John C.,Chung Catherine G.,Kaffenberger Benjamin H.
Abstract
AbstractBackground: In the absence of a gold-standard diagnostic modality for cellulitis, sterile inflammatory disorders may be misdiagnosed as cellulitis. Objective: To determine the utility of skin biopsy and tissue culture for the diagnosis and management of patients admitted with a diagnosis of presumed cellulitis. Design: Pilot single-blind parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial in 56 patients with a primary diagnosis of presumed cellulitis. In the intervention group only, skin biopsy and tissue culture results were made available to the primary care team to guide diagnosis and management. Length of hospital stay and antibiotic use were evaluated as outcome measures. Results: Length of stay showed the greatest opportunity for further study as a primary outcome (intervention: 4, IQR (2–6) vs. control: 5 IQR (3–8) days; p = 0.124). Limitations: The COVID-19 pandemic placed limitations on participant enrollment and study duration; in addition, data was collected from a single medical center. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that length of stay and anti-pseudomonal antibiotic de-escalation are endpoints that may be influenced by biopsy and tissue culture results in presumed cellulitis patients; these outcomes warrant further study.
Funder
The Center for Clinical and Translational Science at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC