Letter to the editor: comparative efficacy and safety of clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide and adapalene/benzoyl peroxide in acne treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Letter to the editor: comparative efficacy and safety of clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide and adapalene/benzoyl peroxide in acne treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Published:2024-09-03 Issue:8 Volume:316 Page:
ISSN:1432-069X
Container-title:Archives of Dermatological Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Arch Dermatol Res

Author:

Sesgundo Jaime Angeles,Borra Ujwala Reddy,Teslim Adewumi Adedamola,Hikal Heba,Qammar Asfia,Adams Dawn,Serag Ibrahim

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-024-03346-w.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Piskin S, Uzunali E (2007) A review of the use of adapalene for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3(4):621–624

2. Kim SY, Ochsendorf FR (2016) New developments in acne treatment: role of combination adapalene-benzoylperoxide. Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:1497–1506

3. Eichenfield LF, Stein Gold L, Kircik LH, Werschler WP, Beer K, Draelos ZD et al (2023) Triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% gel for moderate-to-severe acne in children and adolescents: randomized phase 2 study. Pediatr Dermatol 40(3):452–459

4. Stein Gold L, Baldwin H, Kircik LH, Weiss JS, Pariser DM, Callender V et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%, Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%, and Adapalene 0.15% gel for moderate-to-severe acne: a randomized phase II study of the First Triple-Combination Drug. Am J Clin Dermatol 23(1):93–104

5. Gonzalez P, Vila R, Cirigliano M (2012) The tolerability profile of clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel vs. adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for facial acne: results of a randomized, single-blind, split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol 11(4):251–260