Statutory Bodies and Performance Reporting: Hong Kong and Singapore Experience-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Statutory Bodies and Performance Reporting: Hong Kong and Singapore Experience

Published:2006-09-21 Issue:3 Volume:6 Page:289-304
ISSN:1566-7170
Container-title:Public Organization Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Public Organiz Rev

Author:

Taylor Jeannette

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11115-006-0018-8.pdf

Reference39 articles.

1. Audit Commission 2005a. Performance measurement and reporting in the government. Hong Kong: Audit Commission.

2. Audit Commission 2005b. Controlling officer’s reply to initial written questions: Value for money audit. Reply Serial No. AUD001. Hong Kong: Audit Commission.

3. Bouckaert, G. 1993. Measurement and meaningful management. Public Productivity and Management Review, 17: 31–44.

4. Carter, N. 1994. Performance indicators: ‘Backseat driving’ or ‘hands off control.’ In McKevitt D. & Lawton A. (Eds.), Public sector management: Theory, critique and practice. London: Sage.

5. Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. 1999. The implementation and benefits of strategic performance measures: Evidence from U.S. government agencies. Available online at http://www.msb.georgetown.edu/faculty/cavalluk/Gao0799.PDF .

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Improving the quality of the financial accounting information through strengthening of the financial autonomy at public organizations;Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies;2021-04-30

2. Performance Management in Hong Kong;Public Administration and Public Policy;2010-11-18