Institutional Environment Pressures Perceived by Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's Constituents

Author:

Fushimi KatsutoshiORCID

Abstract

AbstractPublic organisations have rarely been the subjects of neo-institutional research. Intra-organisational behaviour has also been under-researched. This study examined how four distinct groups of Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's staff perceive institutional environment pressures from home and host countries. One-hundred thirty-one valid responses obtained through an online survey were analysed. Staff in both the headquarters and overseas offices felt a powerful home country accountability pressure. This tendency is prominent for management staff. The test results, as seen through the lens of a neo-institutional perspective, suggest that overseas office staff prioritise accountability to home country stakeholders over that to host country stakeholders.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference40 articles.

1. Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772610

2. Bernin, P. (2002). Managers working conditions: Stress and health [Doctoral thesis, Karolinska institutet]. Karolinska Institutet Open Archive. https://openarchive.ki.se/xmlui/handle/10616/42843. Accessed 9 Sept 2021.

3. Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 79–104). SAGE.

4. Branine, M. (2011). Managing across cultures: Concepts, policies, and practices. SAGE.

5. Caperchione, C. M., Reid, R. C., Sharp, P. G., & Stehmeier, J. (2016). How do management and non-management employees perceive workplace wellness programmes? A Qualitative Examination. Health Education Journal, 75(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896915607911

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3